EDITOR BOARD MEMBERS : VIEW ALL
Peer review process
All papers received will be submitted to a peer review
process. The Editors may discard
some
manuscripts from the outright due to notorious low quality or disadjustment with the
journal’s
scope.
Taking in consideration its subjects, the papers passing this
preliminary
screening will be remitted to a panel of referees involved in those research areas. They
can be
either external or members of the Advisory Board, though always chosen by their
recognized
expertise. Each paper will be reviewed by two referees.
After evaluation, the
referees
will produce reports about the works reviewed, by which the papers can be a) accepted
with
modifications or corrections; b) approved as they are or c) rejected from the start. In
case that
the papers proposed are accepted but in need of modifications or corrections, the
Editors will
return the manuscripts to the authors, together with the referee’s reports and all
the
suggestions, recommendations and comments therein.
To secure impartiality
during the
review process, all papers, as remitted to the referees, will be anonymous. Moreover,
the referees
identities will not be known, neither by the rest of the evaluation panel, nor by the
authors.
The final decision concerning the publication of papers belongs to
the Editorial
Board, having the referees a consultative role.
Editor Board
Editor in chief
Dr. Arend L Mapanawang, Sp.PD, FINASIM, PhD
Subject Area
Every article submitted to IJHMCR is screened by Turnitin software.
Indexing
PENGUNJUNG KAMI DARI BERBAGAI BELAHAN DUNIA
